<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>What a beautiful world Comments</title>
	<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>My life to those who care</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2009/02/21/i-need-help/#comment-42</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2009/02/21/i-need-help/#comment-42</guid>
					<description>1. Screwtape
2. Dingoes Ate My Baby
3. Dorian Gray
4. Severe Whimsy
5. Separate Hole
6. Cashmere Rhinos
7. Ideosynchronicity
8. Sissyphus Stone
9. ology
10. Nuisance
11. Disturberation
12. Noogie
13. Tickle Me Emo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>1. Screwtape<br />
2. Dingoes Ate My Baby<br />
3. Dorian Gray<br />
4. Severe Whimsy<br />
5. Separate Hole<br />
6. Cashmere Rhinos<br />
7. Ideosynchronicity<br />
8. Sissyphus Stone<br />
9. ology<br />
10. Nuisance<br />
11. Disturberation<br />
12. Noogie<br />
13. Tickle Me Emo
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emmett</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/27/santa-massacre/#comment-41</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/27/santa-massacre/#comment-41</guid>
					<description>This was so sad. It's hard to see how the remaining family could ever recover with God's help. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This was so sad. It&#8217;s hard to see how the remaining family could ever recover with God&#8217;s help.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emmett</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-40</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-40</guid>
					<description>Take your mind to another place - PLEASE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Take your mind to another place - PLEASE!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emmett</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/11/23/wizardswitches-and-spells-oh-my/#comment-39</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/11/23/wizardswitches-and-spells-oh-my/#comment-39</guid>
					<description>You're such a good thinker, my friend. Your question takes me to several places that could occupy a lot of space. I'll pick only one for now:

It's an easy bandwagon to jump on. 
When I was a kid, a similar outcry came as a result of the TV series &quot;Bewitched.&quot; I even recall having a flier put on our car when I was a kid that basically said that if you watched the show, you were doomed to hell. So, folks trying to be dutiful Christians, if not very thinking ones, jumped on that and railed against that one TV show. Ironically, there were other shows that I think were more damaging to our culture that did NOT get the same bashing. 

I think that in some ways, the Potter scenario is similar. And the assault comes from two sides. There are those who don't like Roald Dahl's works because they tend to paint adults as bad, greedy, untrustworthy, etc. You'll find this element in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, James and the Giant Peach, Matilda, The Witches, etc. Then, you have that portion of the Christian population that tends toward the &quot;anti-Bewitched&quot; crowd. These groups joined forces against Potter from the beginning - it was somewhat anti-adult, and certainly had magic in it. 

LOTR gets off, I think, because, in large part, it's been around long enough that people don't think about it not being around. The Hobbit was written in the 1930s for Tolkien's sons. It took him another twenty years to get LOTR &quot;finished-enough&quot; for publication. In many ways, LOTR began the entire genre of modern fantasy literature. 

Potter on the other hand is quite new. Came on quickly, had a lot of children reading it, and was a great target! 

To me, there are so many other things in our culture that you can legitimately battle, Potter is very small. In fact, there are many things about the Potter series that are quite noble: love, friendship and loyalty being three themes that Rowling develops to a high degree. Harry's courage in the face of evil is a lesson in itself. 

I agree with Jason, though. Fear and laziness are key answers to your question. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You&#8217;re such a good thinker, my friend. Your question takes me to several places that could occupy a lot of space. I&#8217;ll pick only one for now:</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s an easy bandwagon to jump on.<br />
When I was a kid, a similar outcry came as a result of the TV series &#8220;Bewitched.&#8221; I even recall having a flier put on our car when I was a kid that basically said that if you watched the show, you were doomed to hell. So, folks trying to be dutiful Christians, if not very thinking ones, jumped on that and railed against that one TV show. Ironically, there were other shows that I think were more damaging to our culture that did NOT get the same bashing. </p>
	<p>I think that in some ways, the Potter scenario is similar. And the assault comes from two sides. There are those who don&#8217;t like Roald Dahl&#8217;s works because they tend to paint adults as bad, greedy, untrustworthy, etc. You&#8217;ll find this element in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, James and the Giant Peach, Matilda, The Witches, etc. Then, you have that portion of the Christian population that tends toward the &#8220;anti-Bewitched&#8221; crowd. These groups joined forces against Potter from the beginning - it was somewhat anti-adult, and certainly had magic in it. </p>
	<p>LOTR gets off, I think, because, in large part, it&#8217;s been around long enough that people don&#8217;t think about it not being around. The Hobbit was written in the 1930s for Tolkien&#8217;s sons. It took him another twenty years to get LOTR &#8220;finished-enough&#8221; for publication. In many ways, LOTR began the entire genre of modern fantasy literature. </p>
	<p>Potter on the other hand is quite new. Came on quickly, had a lot of children reading it, and was a great target! </p>
	<p>To me, there are so many other things in our culture that you can legitimately battle, Potter is very small. In fact, there are many things about the Potter series that are quite noble: love, friendship and loyalty being three themes that Rowling develops to a high degree. Harry&#8217;s courage in the face of evil is a lesson in itself. </p>
	<p>I agree with Jason, though. Fear and laziness are key answers to your question.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/21/because-i-said-so/#comment-38</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/21/because-i-said-so/#comment-38</guid>
					<description>Sometimes, that arguement gets trotted out because it takes less time than actually attempting to explain the reasoning and perspective used to make the decision - reasoning and perspective that, at your age, you wouldn't agree with anyway, so why get into a debate? As a parent, I'm bigger than you, I pay your bills, you live in my house, so deal with it.

At least, that's the rationale some folks use. And I'll admit - sometimes, all you want to do is avoid another arguement.

But you can trust me on this - 9 times out of 10, when your folks toss that line at you, they have their reasons, and those reasons are very good and very beneficial for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sometimes, that arguement gets trotted out because it takes less time than actually attempting to explain the reasoning and perspective used to make the decision - reasoning and perspective that, at your age, you wouldn&#8217;t agree with anyway, so why get into a debate? As a parent, I&#8217;m bigger than you, I pay your bills, you live in my house, so deal with it.</p>
	<p>At least, that&#8217;s the rationale some folks use. And I&#8217;ll admit - sometimes, all you want to do is avoid another arguement.</p>
	<p>But you can trust me on this - 9 times out of 10, when your folks toss that line at you, they have their reasons, and those reasons are very good and very beneficial for you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-37</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-37</guid>
					<description>How do you know that the cube is referring to Elmo? Since the snowman is, uh, &quot;receiving&quot; from Elmo, might not the snowman be the cube's subject?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How do you know that the cube is referring to Elmo? Since the snowman is, uh, &#8220;receiving&#8221; from Elmo, might not the snowman be the cube&#8217;s subject?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: btowhey</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-36</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-36</guid>
					<description>I actually have the ice cube hanging above Elmo's head </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I actually have the ice cube hanging above Elmo&#8217;s head
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Haley Davis</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-35</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-35</guid>
					<description>Haha I was thinking the exact same thing Jason posted!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Haha I was thinking the exact same thing Jason posted!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sebren</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/12/19/bad-ornament-designs/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>maybe the second picture describes the first . . . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>maybe the second picture describes the first . . .
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/11/23/wizardswitches-and-spells-oh-my/#comment-33</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://btowhey.blogsome.com/2008/11/23/wizardswitches-and-spells-oh-my/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>Part of the reason that Tolkein wrote LOTR was out of a dicussion that he and C.S. Lewis had regarding a deartho ficiton written by Christians. The overall tone of the series was intended to draw people into a discussion that would lead to sharing the principles of the faith.

I think that in and of itself is why LOTR gets the pass and the wizard prince gets nailed. Rowling didn't write the books with the intention of moving people into a discussion that would lead to Christianity, so it gets pooped on. The irony is, that if Christians would take the time to examine the books carefully, they could find some way to use the content to bring about a discussion of the faith. But fear and laziness in thinking gets in the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Part of the reason that Tolkein wrote LOTR was out of a dicussion that he and C.S. Lewis had regarding a deartho ficiton written by Christians. The overall tone of the series was intended to draw people into a discussion that would lead to sharing the principles of the faith.</p>
	<p>I think that in and of itself is why LOTR gets the pass and the wizard prince gets nailed. Rowling didn&#8217;t write the books with the intention of moving people into a discussion that would lead to Christianity, so it gets pooped on. The irony is, that if Christians would take the time to examine the books carefully, they could find some way to use the content to bring about a discussion of the faith. But fear and laziness in thinking gets in the way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
